dr babasaheb ambedkar information in marathi sanshipatparichyy

Our foreign policy is in complete opposition to these words of wisdom uttered by two of the worlds greatest men.

This article does not intend to go into the technicalities of Article 370.

Even the political churning between the Left, Right and the Centre around Article 370 has become cliched now.

What this piece does is take a glance at the significance of Article 370, which may help us gauge the political narrative built around it across the political spectrum.

It restricts Parliaments legislative powers in respect of JK.

Earlier, the Instrument of Accession (IoA) came into play when the Indian Independence Act, 1947, divided British India into India and Pakistan.

For the 565 princely states whose sovereignty was restored on Independence, the Act provided three options: to remain an independent country, join the Dominion of India, or join the Dominion of Pakistan and this joining with either of the two countries was to be through an IoA.

Laws on other matters enacted by Indias Parliament, however, require ratification by the states own legislature.

Article 35A gives further immunity by mandating that no act passed by the JK legislature can be challenged for violating the Indian Constitution or other laws passed by Indias Parliament.

N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, one-time Prime Minister of Kashmir and the chief drafter of Article 370, saw it as a temporary and interim arrangement.

While the judgment in Kesavananda Bharati directed that any amendment to the Constitution could be tested for potentially violating the basic structure of the Constitution, Articles 370 and 35A were passed before the judgment and thus cannot be challenged based on this.

The only body with powers to dissolve Article 370 was the Constituent Assembly of JK which was however dissolved in 1957 without making any recommendation on Article 370.

Because what is the alternative The alternative is compulsion and coercion.

Every time Kashmir is in the news, a viral message regarding Ambedkars views is widely shared on social media.

This quote of Ambedkar has been used by Subramanian Swamy, Sushil Pandit, and many other right wing leaders at almost every forum related to Kashmir issues.

Various columns in famous publications like India today, Daily Pioneer, The Hindu, Employment News, Indian Defence review, Law corner, DailyO and more have carried this quote of Ambedkar.

But government of India should have only limited powers and Indian people should have no right in Kashmir.

To give consent in your proposal, would be treacherous thing against the interest of India and I, as a Law Minister of India, will never do.

Specifically, his writings and speeches on Pakistan and the Partition of India, Consituent Assembly debates, etc.

Through this article, I challenge all those who have peddled this fake news for more than two decades to present and authenticate documentary evidence of this quote.

Anyone who has followed the course of our foreign policy and along with it the attitude of other countries towards India, could not fail to realize the sudden change that has taken place in their attitude towards us.

On 15th of August, 1947 when we began our life as an independent country, there was no country which wished us ill.

We are pursuing a lonely furrow with no one even to second our resolutions in the U.N.O.

Bismark has said that politics is not a game of realizing the ideal.

Bernard Shaw not very long ago said that good ideals are good but one must not forget that it is often dangerous to be too good.

Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Information In Marathi Sanshipatparichyy